No to AV, Yes to PR

Lord Owen Speaking at No to AV Final Rally

Lord Owen speaking at the final rally of the No to AV campaign said:….

for full speech click here

No to AV Final Rally, Central Hall, London, 3 May 2011

How Should Supporters of PR Vote on AV

How Should Supporters of PR Vote on AV

To listen to the full interview click here..

Interview with Lord Owen, Today Programme, BBC, 28 April 2011

David Owen says “Electoral Reformers Should Have Held Out For Real Reform”

David Owen says “Electorial reformers should have held out for real reform”.

Read more below:

New Poll Shows Yes Campaign Failing to Persuade  Voters, Press Release, April 2011

“AV Referendum: Nick Clegg is Failing Vote Reformers, says Lord Owen”, published Daily Telegraph, April 2011

David Owen: I support a PR system, but I will be voting ‘no’ in the AV referendum

Published in the Independent Sunday, 13 March 2011

The referendum on AV has, unsurprisingly, generated very limited enthusiasm. People know they are being used as part of a fix between politicians unwilling to trust voters and let them have a free choice between proportional representation as well as AV and the status quo. Fixes happen in Parliament, but they have no place in the referendum.


We Will Continue to Campaign for PR

We Will Continue to Campaign for PR

Article by Lord Owen et al, The Guardian, Friday March 2011

Click here to view the full article

Speech to The House of Lords debate on The Constitutional and Parliament Effect of Coalition Government


20 JANUARY 2011

My Lords, the circumstances in which this Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition came into existence need to be recalled. It was against a very serious financial crisis, a large structural fiscal deficit and a feeling in the country that, as a result of the negotiations, we had to have a Government which would, first, carry conviction in international markets-their first challenge, which they met very successfully-and, secondly, start to deal with the structural fiscal deficit. They have started on that and I hope the jury is out, certainly among economists, as to whether they have moved too swiftly and too harshly or whether they have judged the situation correctly and that it will be proven in the next year or two.